![]() ![]() For loops involving indexes tend to generate off by one bugs.įor loops often reuse the same variables, increasing the chance of really hard to find scoping bugs.įor loops increase the number of places a bug hunter has to look. Programmers love to put clever things in for loops, even if I write it to "only do what it is intended to do", that does not preclude someone coming along and adding some additional clever "fix". Even if it is commented and has meaningful variables names, they still have to make sure it is not doing anything "clever". Someone reading my code has to figure out what I am doing in that for loop. The default will match the current platform’s operating system. Both are available regardless of the Windows version currently in use, but 64-bit targets will not be executable on 32-bit versions of Windows. ![]() They add to the number of lines of code even if they are tucked away in another function. Two architectures are available under Simply Fortran, either 32-bit or 64-bit. I try to avoid for loops when they are not completely necessary because: Repeat string javascript Create NSString by repeating another string a given number of times Repeat count the number of times to use a descriptor or group of descriptors. Minimum number of digits to be displayed. ![]() I know I could write this using a for loop, but I wish to avoid for loops whenever necessary and a simple direct method should exist somewhere. Number of digits to right of the decimal place for real input or output. I'm looking for a simple commons method or operator that allows me to repeat some string n times. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |